• English
  • Français
  • Español
Logo
  Iniciar sesion | Registrarse
  • Página de inicio
  • Sobre nosotros
    • TAPipedia
    • TAP
    • ¿Quiénes somos?
    • ¿Qué hacemos?
    • ¿Cómo recolectamos nuestros recursos?
    • ¿Por qué debería unirse a TAPipedia?
  • Recursos
  • Red de TAPipedia
  • Preguntas más frecuentes
  • Contáctenos

Resultados de la búsqueda

Displaying 171 - 180 of 244 results.

A Tool for the Sustainability Assessment of Farms: Selection, Adaptation and Use of Indicators for an Italian Case Study

Indicator-based tools are widely used for the assessment of farm sustainability, but analysts still face methodological and conceptual issues, including data availability, the complexity of the concept of sustainability and the heterogeneity of agricultural systems. This study contributes to this debate through the illustration of a procedure for farm sustainability assessment focussed on the case study of the South Milan Agricultural Park, Italy. The application is based on a set of environmental, social and economic indicators retrieved from the literature review.

Tema(s): 
desarrollo de capacidades (DC)evaluación de impactopolíticasdesarrollo ruralagricultura sostenible...
Año de publicación: 
2017
Dónde se encuentra el recurso?: 
  • Upload file
View Resource More Info

Mobile money, market transactions, and household income in rural Kenya

Mobile phone based money services have spread rapidly in many developing countries. We analyze micro level impacts using panel data from smallholder farmers in Kenya. Mobile money use has a large positive net impact on household income. One important pathway is through remittances, which contribute to income directly but also help to reduce risk and liquidity constraints, thus promoting agricultural commercialization. Mobile money users apply more purchased inputs, market a larger proportion of their output, and have higher farm profits.

Tema(s): 
evaluación de impactosistemas de innovaciónTICdesarrollo rural
Año de publicación: 
2013
Autor (es): 
Kikulwe E. M.Fischer E.Qaim M.
Dónde se encuentra el recurso?: 
  • Upload file
View Resource More Info

Genetically Modified Crops and Food Security

The role of genetically modified (GM) crops for food security is the subject of public controversy. GM crops could contribute to food production increases and higher food availability. There may also be impacts on food quality and nutrient composition. Finally, growing GM crops may influence farmers’ income and thus their economic access to food. Smallholder farmers make up a large proportion of the undernourished people worldwide. Our study focuses on this latter aspect and provides the first ex post analysis of food security impacts of GM crops at the micro level.

Tema(s): 
seguridad alimentaria y nutricionalevaluación de impactosistemas de innovacióndesarrollo ruralagricultura sostenible...
Año de publicación: 
2013
Autor (es): 
Qaim M.Kouzer S.
Dónde se encuentra el recurso?: 
  • Upload file
View Resource More Info

The influence of farm input subsidies on the adoption of natural resource management technologies

Farm input subsidies are often criticised on economic and ecological grounds. The promotion of natural resource management (NRM) technologies is widely seen as more sustainable to increase agricultural productivity and food security. Relatively little is known about how input subsidies affect farmers’ decisions to adopt NRM technologies. There are concerns of incompatibility, because NRM technologies are one strategy to reduce the use of external inputs in intensive production systems.

Tema(s): 
Formas de explotación agrariaevaluación de impactosistemas de innovacióndesarrollo ruralagricultura sostenible...
Año de publicación: 
2017
Autor (es): 
Koppmair S.Kassie M.Qaim M.
Dónde se encuentra el recurso?: 
  • Upload file
View Resource More Info

Weather index insurance, agricultural input use, and crop productivity in Kenya

Weather risk is a serious issue in the African small farm sector that will further increase due to climate change. Farmers typically react by using low amounts of agricultural inputs. Low input use can help to minimize financial loss in bad years, but is also associated with low average yield and income. Increasing small farm productivity and income is an important prerequisite for rural poverty reduction and food security. Crop insurance could incentivize farmers to increase their input use, but indemnity-based crop insurance programs are plagued by market failures.

Tema(s): 
cambio climáticoactividades de extensiónevaluación de impactosistemas de innovacióndesarrollo ruralagricultura sostenible...
Año de publicación: 
2019
Autor (es): 
Sibiko K. W.Qaim M.
Dónde se encuentra el recurso?: 
  • Upload file
View Resource More Info

Synergies between Different Types of Agricultural Technologies in the Kenyan Small Farm Sector

Sustainable intensification of agriculture will have to build on various innovations, but synergies between different types of technologies are not yet sufficiently understood. We use representative data from small farms in Kenya and propensity score matching to compare effects of input-intensive technologies and natural resource management practices on household income. When adopted in combination, positive income effects tend to be larger than when individual technologies are adopted alone.

Tema(s): 
evaluación de impactosistemas de innovacióndesarrollo ruralagricultura sostenible
Año de publicación: 
2017
Autor (es): 
Wainaina P.Tongruksawattana S.Qaim M.
Dónde se encuentra el recurso?: 
  • Upload file
View Resource More Info

Seed market liberalization, hybrid maize adoption, and impacts on smallholder farmers in Tanzania

Since the early 1990s, liberalization of the seed market in Tanzania has attracted several foreign companies that now market maize hybrids in the country. In this article, we analyze the impacts of proprietary hybrids on maize yields, production, and household living standards. We build on a recent survey of smallholder maize farmers in two zones of Tanzania. Hybrid adoption rates are 48% and 13% in the North and East, respectively. Average net yield gains of hybrids are 50-60%, and there are also significant profit effects.

Tema(s): 
evaluación de impactosistemas de innovacióndesarrollo ruralagricultura sostenible
Año de publicación: 
2012
Autor (es): 
Kathage J.Qaim M.Kassie M.Shiferaw B. A.
Dónde se encuentra el recurso?: 
  • Upload file
View Resource More Info

Transgenic Virus Resistant Potatoes in Mexico: Potential Socioeconomic Implications of North-South Biotechnology Transfer

Despite the rapid international development of biotechnology, we still lack knowledge and information about how low- and middle-income countries can best access this promising technology. Nor are the socioeconomic repercussions of applying biotechnology in these countries’ agricultural sectors well understood. This study seeks to fill in some of the gaps in our knowledge by analyzing a biotechnology transfer project that provided proprietary recombinant potato technology to Mexico.

Tema(s): 
evaluación de impactosistemas de innovacióndesarrollo ruralagricultura sostenible
Año de publicación: 
1998
Autor (es): 
Qaim M.
Dónde se encuentra el recurso?: 
  • Upload file
View Resource More Info

Farmer participation in supermarket channels and technical efficiency: The case of vegetable production in Kenya

Supermarkets and high-value exports are currently gaining ground in the agri-food systems of many developing countries. While recent research has analyzed income effects in the small farm sector, impacts on farming efficiency have hardly been studied. Using a survey of Kenyan vegetable growers and a stochastic frontier approach, we show that participation in supermarket channels increases mean technical efficiency by 19%. This gain is bigger at lower levels of efficiency, suggesting the potential for positive income distribution effects.

Tema(s): 
evaluación de impactosistemas de innovaciónenfoques participativosdesarrollo ruralagricultura sostenible...
Año de publicación: 
2009
Autor (es): 
Rao E. J. O.Qaim M.
Dónde se encuentra el recurso?: 
  • Upload file
View Resource More Info

The impact of agricultural biotechnology on yields, risks, and biodiversity in low-income countries

This paper shows that the current generation of transgenic crop varieties has significant potential to improve economic welfare in low-income countries. These varieties might increase crop yields in low-income countries in cases when pesticides have not been used. They will reduce negative health effects of chemicals when they replace them. With low transaction costs, appropriate infrastructure, and access to intellectual property, multiple varieties of transgenics will be introduced.

Tema(s): 
evaluación de impactosistemas de innovacióndesarrollo ruralagricultura sostenible
Año de publicación: 
2007
Autor (es): 
Zilberman D.Ameden H.Qaim M.
Dónde se encuentra el recurso?: 
  • Upload file
View Resource More Info

Páginas

  • primero
  • anterior
  • …
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • …
  • siguiente
  • último

Sorting block

  • sort ascendingRelevancy
  • Título
  • Año de publicación

Filtrar por idioma

  • (-) Remove Inglés filter InglésInglés
  • Español (38) Apply Español filter Español
  • Francés (19) Apply Francés filter Francés

Filtrar por tema(s)

  • (-) Remove impact assessment filter impact assessmentimpact assessment
  • advisory services (23) Apply advisory services filter advisory services
  • advocacy (8) Apply advocacy filter advocacy
  • brokering (6) Apply brokering filter brokering
  • capacity development (CD) (136) Apply capacity development (CD) filter capacity development (CD)
  • climate change (31) Apply climate change filter climate change
  • communication (16) Apply communication filter communication
  • documentation (10) Apply documentation filter documentation
  • education (22) Apply education filter education
  • extension (54) Apply extension filter extension
  • facilitation (10) Apply facilitation filter facilitation
  • farming systems (25) Apply farming systems filter farming systems
  • food and nutrition security (60) Apply food and nutrition security filter food and nutrition security
  • gender equality (32) Apply gender equality filter gender equality
  • innovation systems (149) Apply innovation systems filter innovation systems
  • knowledge and information systems (43) Apply knowledge and information systems filter knowledge and information systems
  • learning (36) Apply learning filter learning
  • monitoring and evaluation (M&E) (47) Apply monitoring and evaluation (M&E) filter monitoring and evaluation (M&E)
  • multi-stakeholder processes (37) Apply multi-stakeholder processes filter multi-stakeholder processes
  • needs assessment (26) Apply needs assessment filter needs assessment
  • negotiation (4) Apply negotiation filter negotiation
  • networks (37) Apply networks filter networks
  • participatory approaches (37) Apply participatory approaches filter participatory approaches
  • policies (49) Apply policies filter policies
  • private sector engagement (32) Apply private sector engagement filter private sector engagement
  • public sector engagement (33) Apply public sector engagement filter public sector engagement
  • research (71) Apply research filter research
  • rural development (62) Apply rural development filter rural development
  • south-south cooperation (8) Apply south-south cooperation filter south-south cooperation
  • sustainable agriculture (70) Apply sustainable agriculture filter sustainable agriculture
  • value chains (82) Apply value chains filter value chains

Filtrar por autor(es)

  • Adekunle A. A. (2) Apply Adekunle A. A. filter Adekunle A. A.
  • Agapitova, N. (2) Apply Agapitova, N. filter Agapitova, N.
  • Baloch M.A. (2) Apply Baloch M.A. filter Baloch M.A.
  • Behrens, J. (2) Apply Behrens, J. filter Behrens, J.
  • Dhehibi B. (2) Apply Dhehibi B. filter Dhehibi B.
  • Fanzo J. (2) Apply Fanzo J. filter Fanzo J.
  • Farmer Group Institution’s Typology and Agricultural Innovation Implementation Sustainability (2) Apply Farmer Group Institution’s Typology and Agricultural Innovation Implementation Sustainability filter Farmer Group Institution’s Typology and Agricultural Innovation Implementation Sustainability
  • Fischer E. (3) Apply Fischer E. filter Fischer E.
  • Henning C. (2) Apply Henning C. filter Henning C.
  • Hoerner D. (2) Apply Hoerner D. filter Hoerner D.
  • Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe (2) Apply Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe filter Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe
  • International Fund for Agricultural Development (3) Apply International Fund for Agricultural Development filter International Fund for Agricultural Development
  • Kassie M. (3) Apply Kassie M. filter Kassie M.
  • Kathage J. (2) Apply Kathage J. filter Kathage J.
  • Kikulwe E. M. (2) Apply Kikulwe E. M. filter Kikulwe E. M.
  • Klasen S. (2) Apply Klasen S. filter Klasen S.
  • Krampe E. (2) Apply Krampe E. filter Krampe E.
  • Makate C. (4) Apply Makate C. filter Makate C.
  • Makate M. (2) Apply Makate M. filter Makate M.
  • Mango N. (5) Apply Mango N. filter Mango N.
  • Martin, A. (2) Apply Martin, A. filter Martin, A.
  • Matuschke I. (2) Apply Matuschke I. filter Matuschke I.
  • Meinzen-Dick R. (2) Apply Meinzen-Dick R. filter Meinzen-Dick R.
  • Noltze M. (2) Apply Noltze M. filter Noltze M.
  • Nyikahadzoi K. (4) Apply Nyikahadzoi K. filter Nyikahadzoi K.
  • Otoo, S. (2) Apply Otoo, S. filter Otoo, S.
  • Qaim M. (36) Apply Qaim M. filter Qaim M.
  • Rao E. J. O. (2) Apply Rao E. J. O. filter Rao E. J. O.
  • Romney, D. (2) Apply Romney, D. filter Romney, D.
  • Ruml A. (2) Apply Ruml A. filter Ruml A.
  • Sartas M. (2) Apply Sartas M. filter Sartas M.
  • Schut, M. (2) Apply Schut, M. filter Schut, M.
  • Schut M. (2) Apply Schut M. filter Schut M.
  • Schwarze S. (2) Apply Schwarze S. filter Schwarze S.
  • Sellare J. (2) Apply Sellare J. filter Sellare J.
  • Sibhatu K. T. (2) Apply Sibhatu K. T. filter Sibhatu K. T.
  • Siziba S. (2) Apply Siziba S. filter Siziba S.
  • Stone G. D. (2) Apply Stone G. D. filter Stone G. D.
  • Thapa G.B. (2) Apply Thapa G.B. filter Thapa G.B.
  • The World Bank (2) Apply The World Bank filter The World Bank
  • Thiele G. (2) Apply Thiele G. filter Thiele G.
  • Tomich T. P. (2) Apply Tomich T. P. filter Tomich T. P.
  • van Asten P. (2) Apply van Asten P. filter van Asten P.
  • Weinberger K. (2) Apply Weinberger K. filter Weinberger K.
  • What Are the Implications of Digitalisation for Agricultural Knowledge? (2) Apply What Are the Implications of Digitalisation for Agricultural Knowledge? filter What Are the Implications of Digitalisation for Agricultural Knowledge?
  • Williams F. (2) Apply Williams F. filter Williams F.
  • Wollni M. (3) Apply Wollni M. filter Wollni M.
  • World Bank (2) Apply World Bank filter World Bank
  • World Food Programme (2) Apply World Food Programme filter World Food Programme
  • Zilberman D. (2) Apply Zilberman D. filter Zilberman D.

Filtrar por países

  • Kenya (27) Apply Kenya filter Kenya
  • Ethiopia (26) Apply Ethiopia filter Ethiopia
  • Ghana (20) Apply Ghana filter Ghana
  • India (17) Apply India filter India
  • Malawi (16) Apply Malawi filter Malawi
  • Uganda (15) Apply Uganda filter Uganda
  • Mozambique (11) Apply Mozambique filter Mozambique
  • Bangladesh (10) Apply Bangladesh filter Bangladesh
  • Tanzania (10) Apply Tanzania filter Tanzania
  • Zambia (9) Apply Zambia filter Zambia
  • Indonesia (8) Apply Indonesia filter Indonesia
  • Thailand (8) Apply Thailand filter Thailand
  • South Sudan (7) Apply South Sudan filter South Sudan
  • Burkina Faso (6) Apply Burkina Faso filter Burkina Faso
  • Nigeria (6) Apply Nigeria filter Nigeria
  • Pakistan (6) Apply Pakistan filter Pakistan
  • Rwanda (6) Apply Rwanda filter Rwanda
  • United Republic of Tanzania (6) Apply United Republic of Tanzania filter United Republic of Tanzania
  • China (5) Apply China filter China
  • Germany (5) Apply Germany filter Germany
  • Philippines (5) Apply Philippines filter Philippines
  • Zimbabwe (5) Apply Zimbabwe filter Zimbabwe
  • Benin (4) Apply Benin filter Benin
  • Brazil (4) Apply Brazil filter Brazil
  • Colombia (4) Apply Colombia filter Colombia
  • Mali (4) Apply Mali filter Mali
  • Nepal (4) Apply Nepal filter Nepal
  • Niger (4) Apply Niger filter Niger
  • Sierra Leone (4) Apply Sierra Leone filter Sierra Leone
  • Vietnam (4) Apply Vietnam filter Vietnam
  • Angola (3) Apply Angola filter Angola
  • Australia (3) Apply Australia filter Australia
  • Burundi (3) Apply Burundi filter Burundi
  • Cambodia (3) Apply Cambodia filter Cambodia
  • Cameroon (3) Apply Cameroon filter Cameroon
  • Chile (3) Apply Chile filter Chile
  • Côte d'Ivoire (3) Apply Côte d'Ivoire filter Côte d'Ivoire
  • Egypt (3) Apply Egypt filter Egypt
  • Honduras (3) Apply Honduras filter Honduras
  • Italy (3) Apply Italy filter Italy
  • Lesotho (3) Apply Lesotho filter Lesotho
  • Mexico (3) Apply Mexico filter Mexico
  • Peru (3) Apply Peru filter Peru
  • Senegal (3) Apply Senegal filter Senegal
  • Sudan (3) Apply Sudan filter Sudan
  • United States (3) Apply United States filter United States
  • Afghanistan (2) Apply Afghanistan filter Afghanistan
  • Algeria (2) Apply Algeria filter Algeria
  • Argentina (2) Apply Argentina filter Argentina
  • Canada (2) Apply Canada filter Canada

Filtrar por editorial(es)

  • Elsevier (23) Apply Elsevier filter Elsevier
  • Springer (16) Apply Springer filter Springer
  • World Bank (14) Apply World Bank filter World Bank
  • University of Göttingen (12) Apply University of Göttingen filter University of Göttingen
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (8) Apply Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations filter Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  • PLOS ONE (8) Apply PLOS ONE filter PLOS ONE
  • Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (7) Apply Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International filter Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International
  • Taylor & Francis (7) Apply Taylor & Francis filter Taylor & Francis
  • Science Direct (6) Apply Science Direct filter Science Direct
  • United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (6) Apply United States Agency for International Development (USAID) filter United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
  • Wiley (6) Apply Wiley filter Wiley
  • Annual Reviews (5) Apply Annual Reviews filter Annual Reviews
  • International Fund for Agricultural Development (5) Apply International Fund for Agricultural Development filter International Fund for Agricultural Development
  • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) (5) Apply International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) filter International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (4) Apply International Food Policy Research Institute filter International Food Policy Research Institute
  • CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) (3) Apply CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) filter CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS)
  • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) (3) Apply International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) filter International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)
  • Journal Storage (3) Apply Journal Storage filter Journal Storage
  • Oxford University Press (3) Apply Oxford University Press filter Oxford University Press
  • Routledge (3) Apply Routledge filter Routledge
  • Academic Journals (2) Apply Academic Journals filter Academic Journals
  • AgEcon Search (2) Apply AgEcon Search filter AgEcon Search
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) (2) Apply Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) filter Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
  • Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) (2) Apply Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) filter Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)
  • Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services (2) Apply Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services filter Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services
  • Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (2) Apply Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture filter Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture
  • MDPI (2) Apply MDPI filter MDPI
  • Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (2) Apply Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute filter Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
  • Taylor & Francis Group (2) Apply Taylor & Francis Group filter Taylor & Francis Group
  • Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) (2) Apply Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) filter Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA)
  • University of Hohenheim (2) Apply University of Hohenheim filter University of Hohenheim
  • Wageningen University and Research Centre (2) Apply Wageningen University and Research Centre filter Wageningen University and Research Centre
  • World Food Program (2) Apply World Food Program filter World Food Program
  • ACDI/VOCA (1) Apply ACDI/VOCA filter ACDI/VOCA
  • BioMed Central (BMC) (1) Apply BioMed Central (BMC) filter BioMed Central (BMC)
  • Centro Latinoamericano para el Desarrollo Rural (1) Apply Centro Latinoamericano para el Desarrollo Rural filter Centro Latinoamericano para el Desarrollo Rural
  • Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) (1) Apply Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI) filter Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI)
  • International Association of Agricultural Economists (1) Apply International Association of Agricultural Economists filter International Association of Agricultural Economists
  • Journal of Information and Data Management (JIDM) (1) Apply Journal of Information and Data Management (JIDM) filter Journal of Information and Data Management (JIDM)
  • Katalyst (1) Apply Katalyst filter Katalyst
  • Michigan State University (1) Apply Michigan State University filter Michigan State University
  • Research Gate (1) Apply Research Gate filter Research Gate
  • Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía (1) Apply Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía filter Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía
  • Royal Society of Chemistry (1) Apply Royal Society of Chemistry filter Royal Society of Chemistry
  • The American Association for Agricultural Education (1) Apply The American Association for Agricultural Education filter The American Association for Agricultural Education
  • The Center for Social Forestry, Mulawarman University (1) Apply The Center for Social Forestry, Mulawarman University filter The Center for Social Forestry, Mulawarman University
  • University of Rwanda (1) Apply University of Rwanda filter University of Rwanda
  • Washington State University (1) Apply Washington State University filter Washington State University
  • Winrock International (1) Apply Winrock International filter Winrock International
  • World Food Programme (1) Apply World Food Programme filter World Food Programme

Filtrar por region

  • África (94) Apply África filter África
  • Américas (18) Apply Américas filter Américas
  • Area interfronteriza (25) Apply Area interfronteriza filter Area interfronteriza
  • Asia (50) Apply Asia filter Asia
  • Europa (12) Apply Europa filter Europa
  • Oceanía (8) Apply Oceanía filter Oceanía

Filtrar por tipo

  • book (12) Apply book filter book
  • book chapter (6) Apply book chapter filter book chapter
  • brief (9) Apply brief filter brief
  • capacity development tools (1) Apply capacity development tools filter capacity development tools
  • case studies (6) Apply case studies filter case studies
  • conference paper (11) Apply conference paper filter conference paper
  • conference proceedings (2) Apply conference proceedings filter conference proceedings
  • discussion paper (10) Apply discussion paper filter discussion paper
  • impact studies (2) Apply impact studies filter impact studies
  • journal article (107) Apply journal article filter journal article
  • learning and facilitation tools (1) Apply learning and facilitation tools filter learning and facilitation tools
  • magazine article (1) Apply magazine article filter magazine article
  • poster (3) Apply poster filter poster
  • presentation (1) Apply presentation filter presentation
  • report (49) Apply report filter report
  • thesis (5) Apply thesis filter thesis
  • working paper (18) Apply working paper filter working paper

Filtrar por año de publicación

  • 1998 (2) Apply 1998 filter 1998
  • 1999 (1) Apply 1999 filter 1999
  • 2001 (1) Apply 2001 filter 2001
  • 2002 (1) Apply 2002 filter 2002
  • 2003 (1) Apply 2003 filter 2003
  • 2004 (1) Apply 2004 filter 2004
  • 2005 (3) Apply 2005 filter 2005
  • 2006 (1) Apply 2006 filter 2006
  • 2007 (8) Apply 2007 filter 2007
  • 2008 (4) Apply 2008 filter 2008
  • 2009 (8) Apply 2009 filter 2009
  • 2010 (10) Apply 2010 filter 2010
  • 2011 (7) Apply 2011 filter 2011
  • 2012 (11) Apply 2012 filter 2012
  • 2013 (18) Apply 2013 filter 2013
  • 2014 (21) Apply 2014 filter 2014
  • 2015 (18) Apply 2015 filter 2015
  • 2016 (22) Apply 2016 filter 2016
  • 2017 (28) Apply 2017 filter 2017
  • 2018 (15) Apply 2018 filter 2018
  • 2019 (24) Apply 2019 filter 2019
  • 2020 (22) Apply 2020 filter 2020
  • 2021 (13) Apply 2021 filter 2021
  • 2022 (3) Apply 2022 filter 2022
  • 2023 (1) Apply 2023 filter 2023