• English
  • Français
  • Español
Logo
  S identifier | Ιnscrivez vous
  • Accueil
  • À propos de nous
    • TAPipedia
    • TAP
    • Qui nous sommes
    • Ce que nous faisons
    • Comment collectons-nous nos ressources?
    • Pourquoi devriez-vous rejoindre TAPipedia?
  • Ressources
  • Réseau TAPipedia
  • FAQ
  • Contactez nous

Résultats de la recherche

Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 results.

Brokering innovation for sustainable development: The Papa Andina case.

The inadequate linkage of knowledge generation in agricultural research organizations with policy-making and economic activity is an important barrier to sustainable development and poverty reduction. The emerging fields of sustainability science and innovation systems studies highlight the importance of “boundary management” and “innovation brokering” in linking knowledge production, policy-making, and economic activities. This paper analyzes how the Papa Andina Partnership Program, based at the International Potato Center, functions as an innovation broker in the Andean potato sector.

Sujet(s): 
courtagerenforcement des capacités (RC)innovationréseauapproches participativesrechercheagriculture durablechaînes de valeur...
Année de publication: 
2010
Auteur: 
Devaux A.Andrade-Piedra J.Horton D.Ordinola M.Thiele G.Thomann A.Velasco C.
Où est situé la ressource?: 
  • Link to web resource
View Resource More Info

Understanding root, tuber, and banana seed systems and coordination breakdown: A multi-stakeholder framewor

This article presents a multi-stakeholder framework for intervening in root, tuber, and banana seed systems and in other VPCs. These crops are reproduced not with true seed but with vegetative planting material (e.g., roots,tubers, vines, stems, and suckers), called “seed” in this article. Seed systems for VPCs need to be designed differently than those for true seed, and coordination among stakeholders in seed systems is crucial

Sujet(s): 
processus multipartitesRecherche en systèmes
Année de publication: 
2018
Auteur: 
Bentley J.Andrade-Piedra J.Demo P.Dzomeku B.Jacobsen K.Kikulwe E.Kromann P.Kumar P.McEwan M.Mudege N.Ogere K.Okechukwu R.Orrego R.Ospina B.Sperling L.Walsh S.Thiele G.
Où est situé la ressource?: 
  • Link to web resource
View Resource More Info

Understanding innovation: The development and scaling of orange-fleshed sweetpotato in major African food systems

The development and scaling of orange-fleshed sweetpotato (OFSP) during the past 25 years is a case study of a disruptive innovation to address a pressing need – the high levels of vitamin A deficiency among children under five years of age in sub-Saharan Africa. When the innovation was introduced consumers strongly preferred white or yellow-fleshed sweetpotato, so it was necessary to create a demand to respond to that need. This was at odds with the breeding strategy of responding to consumers’ demands.

Sujet(s): 
sécurité alimentaire et nutritionnelleévaluation de l'impactinnovationrecherche
Année de publication: 
2020
Auteur: 
Low J.W.Thiele G.
Où est situé la ressource?: 
  • Link to web resource
View Resource More Info

Factors influencing participation dynamics in research for development interventions with multi-stakeholder platforms: A metric approach to studying stakeholder participation

Multi-stakeholder platforms have become mainstream in projects, programmes and policy interventions aiming to improve innovation and livelihoods systems, i.e. research for development interventions in low-and middle-income contexts. However, the evidence for multi-stakeholder platforms' contribution to the performance of research for development interventions and their added value is not compelling. This paper focuses on stakeholder participation as one of the channels for multi-stakeholder platforms' contribution to the performance of research for development interventions, i.e.

Sujet(s): 
évaluation de l'impactprocessus multipartitesévaluation des besoinsrechercherecherche pour le développement (R4D)...
Année de publication: 
2019
Auteur: 
Sartas M.van Asten P.Schut M.What Are the Implications of Digitalisation for Agricultural Knowledge?Using A Tiered Approach for Implementing Networked Learning Communities: A Case Study on Developing the Capacity of Leaders to Implement Systemwide Innovations within International Training and Development ProgramsInnovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in EuropeTenywa M.Farmer Group Institution’s Typology and Agricultural Innovation Implementation SustainabilityThe Role Of Education System In Preparing Youth For Agricultural Career Decisions And Aspirations: Exploring Ways To Attract More Youth To Engage In Agriculture And Agricultural Entrepreneurship in TanzaniaThiele G.Prospects for the development of the Russian system of agricultural consulting under the conditions of the digital transformation of agrarian economyDevaux A.Leeuwis C.
Où est situé la ressource?: 
  • Link to web resource
View Resource More Info

Participatory research (PR) at CIP with potato farming systems in the Andes: evolution and prospects

Participatory Research (PR) at the International Potato Center (CIP) included seven major experiences. (1) Farmer-back-to-farmer in the 1970s pioneered the idea of working with farmers to identify their needs, propose solutions, and explain the underlying scientific concepts. The ideas were of great influence at CIP and beyond. (2) With integrated pest management (IPM) pilot areas in the early 1990s, entomologists and social scientists developed technologies with farmers in Peru and other countries to control insect pests.

Sujet(s): 
approches participativesrechercherecherche participative
Année de publication: 
2020
Auteur: 
Apriyanti I.Thiele G.Gustiawan A.Bentley J.W.
Où est situé la ressource?: 
  • Link to web resource
View Resource More Info

Sorting block

  • sort ascendingRelevancy
  • Τitre
  • Αnnée de publication

Filtrer par idiome

  • (-) Remove Anglais filter AnglaisAnglais

Filtrer par sujet(s)

  • (-) Remove research filter researchresearch
    • participatory research (1) Apply participatory research filter participatory research
    • research for development (R4D) (1) Apply research for development (R4D) filter research for development (R4D)
    • systems research (1) Apply systems research filter systems research
  • brokering (1) Apply brokering filter brokering
  • capacity development (CD) (1) Apply capacity development (CD) filter capacity development (CD)
  • food and nutrition security (1) Apply food and nutrition security filter food and nutrition security
  • impact assessment (2) Apply impact assessment filter impact assessment
  • innovation systems (2) Apply innovation systems filter innovation systems
  • multi-stakeholder processes (2) Apply multi-stakeholder processes filter multi-stakeholder processes
  • needs assessment (1) Apply needs assessment filter needs assessment
  • networks (1) Apply networks filter networks
  • participatory approaches (2) Apply participatory approaches filter participatory approaches
  • sustainable agriculture (1) Apply sustainable agriculture filter sustainable agriculture
  • value chains (1) Apply value chains filter value chains

Filtrer par auteur(s)

  • (-) Remove Thiele G. filter Thiele G.Thiele G.
  • Adekunle A. A. (9) Apply Adekunle A. A. filter Adekunle A. A.
  • Brunori, G. (5) Apply Brunori, G. filter Brunori, G.
  • Buruchara R. (4) Apply Buruchara R. filter Buruchara R.
  • CDAIS project (4) Apply CDAIS project filter CDAIS project
  • Commission on Sustainable Agriculture Intensification (CoSAI) (5) Apply Commission on Sustainable Agriculture Intensification (CoSAI) filter Commission on Sustainable Agriculture Intensification (CoSAI)
  • Dijkman J. (4) Apply Dijkman J. filter Dijkman J.
  • Douthwaite B. (4) Apply Douthwaite B. filter Douthwaite B.
  • Dror I. (7) Apply Dror I. filter Dror I.
  • Ekong J. (6) Apply Ekong J. filter Ekong J.
  • Fatunbi O. (10) Apply Fatunbi O. filter Fatunbi O.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (14) Apply Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) filter Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations ( FAO ) (4) Apply Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations ( FAO ) filter Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations ( FAO )
  • Grovermann C. (6) Apply Grovermann C. filter Grovermann C.
  • Guiomar, N. (4) Apply Guiomar, N. filter Guiomar, N.
  • Hall A. (5) Apply Hall A. filter Hall A.
  • Hall, A. (15) Apply Hall, A. filter Hall, A.
  • Hartwich F. (5) Apply Hartwich F. filter Hartwich F.
  • Hawkins R. (5) Apply Hawkins R. filter Hawkins R.
  • International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (5) Apply International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) filter International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
  • International Livestock Research Institute (5) Apply International Livestock Research Institute filter International Livestock Research Institute
  • Klerkx L. (17) Apply Klerkx L. filter Klerkx L.
  • Klerkx, L. (12) Apply Klerkx, L. filter Klerkx, L.
  • Knierim, A. (5) Apply Knierim, A. filter Knierim, A.
  • Kumpf, B. (4) Apply Kumpf, B. filter Kumpf, B.
  • Lamers D. (4) Apply Lamers D. filter Lamers D.
  • Leeuwis C. (8) Apply Leeuwis C. filter Leeuwis C.
  • Midgley G. (4) Apply Midgley G. filter Midgley G.
  • Mugabe J. (4) Apply Mugabe J. filter Mugabe J.
  • Nichterlein K. (7) Apply Nichterlein K. filter Nichterlein K.
  • Nyikahadzoi K. (5) Apply Nyikahadzoi K. filter Nyikahadzoi K.
  • Ojijo N.K.O. (9) Apply Ojijo N.K.O. filter Ojijo N.K.O.
  • Pali P. (5) Apply Pali P. filter Pali P.
  • Pinto Correia, T. (5) Apply Pinto Correia, T. filter Pinto Correia, T.
  • Puskur R. (4) Apply Puskur R. filter Puskur R.
  • Puskur, R. (4) Apply Puskur, R. filter Puskur, R.
  • Qaim M. (11) Apply Qaim M. filter Qaim M.
  • Salm M. (5) Apply Salm M. filter Salm M.
  • Sartas M. (7) Apply Sartas M. filter Sartas M.
  • Schut M. (22) Apply Schut M. filter Schut M.
  • Schut, M. (9) Apply Schut, M. filter Schut, M.
  • Sonnino A. (5) Apply Sonnino A. filter Sonnino A.
  • Sulaiman, R. V. (11) Apply Sulaiman, R. V. filter Sulaiman, R. V.
  • Sulaiman R. V. (6) Apply Sulaiman R. V. filter Sulaiman R. V.
  • Tenywa M. M. (5) Apply Tenywa M. M. filter Tenywa M. M.
  • Tropical Agriculture Platform (TAP) (9) Apply Tropical Agriculture Platform (TAP) filter Tropical Agriculture Platform (TAP)
  • Vamsidhar Reddy, T. S. (5) Apply Vamsidhar Reddy, T. S. filter Vamsidhar Reddy, T. S.
  • Wanjiku C. (6) Apply Wanjiku C. filter Wanjiku C.
  • Waters-Bayer A. (5) Apply Waters-Bayer A. filter Waters-Bayer A.
  • World Bank (18) Apply World Bank filter World Bank

Filtrer par pays

  • Peru (3) Apply Peru filter Peru
  • Ecuador (2) Apply Ecuador filter Ecuador
  • Bolivia (1) Apply Bolivia filter Bolivia
  • Ghana (1) Apply Ghana filter Ghana
  • Kenya (1) Apply Kenya filter Kenya
  • Malawi (1) Apply Malawi filter Malawi
  • Nicaragua (1) Apply Nicaragua filter Nicaragua
  • Niger (1) Apply Niger filter Niger
  • Rwanda (1) Apply Rwanda filter Rwanda
  • Tanzania (1) Apply Tanzania filter Tanzania
  • Uganda (1) Apply Uganda filter Uganda

Filtrer par éditeur(s)

  • Elsevier (1) Apply Elsevier filter Elsevier
  • PLOS ONE (1) Apply PLOS ONE filter PLOS ONE
  • Springer (1) Apply Springer filter Springer
  • Taylor & Francis (1) Apply Taylor & Francis filter Taylor & Francis

Filtrer par region

  • Afrique (2) Apply Afrique filter Afrique
  • Amériques (1) Apply Amériques filter Amériques

Filtrer par type

  • book chapter (1) Apply book chapter filter book chapter
  • journal article (3) Apply journal article filter journal article
  • working paper (1) Apply working paper filter working paper

Filtrer par αnnée de publication

  • 2010 (1) Apply 2010 filter 2010
  • 2018 (1) Apply 2018 filter 2018
  • 2019 (1) Apply 2019 filter 2019
  • 2020 (2) Apply 2020 filter 2020