This paper reviews a recent donor-funded project concerning the introduction of post-harvest technology to poor hill farmers in India. Rather than conform to conventional development aid projects of either a “research” or an “interventionist” nature, it combines both approaches in a research-action program, which has more in common with a business development approach than a formal social science one. An important conclusion is that the work (and apparent success) of the project is consistent with an understanding of development that emphasizes the importance of innovation systems.
This paper argues that impact assessment research has not made more of a difference because the measurement of the economic impact has poor diagnostic power. In particular it fails to provide research managers with critical institutional lessons concerning ways of improving research and innovation as a process. Paper's contention is that the linear input-output assumptions of economic assessment need to be complemented by an analytical framework that recognizes systems of reflexive, learning interactions and their location in, and relationship with, their institutional context.
Motivated by donor interest in innovative thinking on food security, the authors conducted an interdisciplinary, triangulation analysis of four divergent conceptual frameworks, each relevant to diagnosing food insecurity in developing countries. They found notable tensions as well as synergistic interactions between agroecology, agricultural innovation systems, social–ecological systems, and political ecology. Cross-framework interactions enhance our understanding of how sectoral and macro-economic development strategies impact on livelihoods, availability, and access.
Innovation platforms (IPs) are a way of organizing multistakeholder interactions, marshalling ideas, people and resources to address challenges and opportunities embedded in complex settings. The approach has its roots in theories of complexity, the concept of innovation systems and practices of participatory action research. IPs have been widely adopted across Africa and beyond in recent years as a “must have” tool in a range of “for development” modes of agricultural research.
This paper presents findings of an explorative case study that looked at 22 organisations identified as fulfilling an intermediary role in the Kenyan agricultural sector. The results show that these organisations fulfill functions that are not limited to distribution of knowledge and putting it into use. The functions also include fostering integration and interaction among the diverse actors engaged in innovation networks and working on technological, organisational and institutional innovation.
The question of how agricultural research can best be used for developmental purposes is a topic of some debate in developmental circles. The idea that this is simply a question of better transfer of ideas from research to farmers has been largely discredited. Agricultural innovation is a process that takes a multitude of different forms, and, within this process, agricultural research and expertise are mobilised at different points in time for different purposes. This paper uses two key analytical principles in order to find how research is actually put into use.
There are divergent views on what capacity development might mean in relation to agricultural biotechnology. The core of this debate is whether this should involve the development of human capital and research infrastructure, or whether it should encompass a wider range of activities which also include developing the capacity to use knowledge productively. This paper uses the innovation systems concept to shed light on this discussion, arguing that it is innovation capacity rather than science and technology capacity that has to be developed.
Este libro busca facilitar procesos de toma de decisiones estratégicas concertadas, sobre el negocio y los mercados a los que estará dirigida la empresa asociativa rural, así como facilitar el diseño de estrategias que permitan desarrollar efectivamente este negocio y vincularse a cadenas de valor, mediante procesos incluyentes que propicien la participación activa y consciente de los socios, socias y colaboradores.
La propuesta metodológica incluida en esta guía busca apoyar a las organizaciones de productores y productoras en sus procesos de fortalecimiento para la prestación [o vinculación con terceros para la prestación] de servicios técnicos, empresariales, financieros y organizativos [complementarios a su negocio central] que son fundamentales para el desarrollo de las personas asociadas, y el éxito del negocio [o los negocios] de la organización.
La propuesta metodológica incluida en esta guía busca apoyar a las organizaciones de productores y productoras en sus procesos de elaboración de planes de negocio, o de revisión y/o ajuste de su plan de negocio actual, de manera que cuenten con un plan detallado para el desarrollo de su negocio central, al igual que de otros negocios complementarios; pero sobretodo, que le permita a la organización avanzar hacia su sostenibilidad, no sólo económica, sino también social y ambiental.