El presente artículo describe los resultados de diseminación participativa de semillas (DPS) en términos productivos, ambientales y socioeconómicos en Cuba y México. El concepto de diseminación participativa de semillas (DPS) surgió en Cuba a partir de la integración de las ferias de diversidad de semillas con la experimentación y diseminación de semillas por los campesinos. Una feria de diversidad de semillas es un método donde los fitomejoradores, productores y agentes extensionistas tienen acceso a la diversidad en uno o más cultivos.
A partir de experiencias de investigación-transformación en sistemas agrícolas en Cuba, el trabajo examina áreas relevantes en una concepción de desarrollo rural sustentable, como el fortalecimiento y la diversificación de los sistemas agropecuarios y las economías locales, la articulación de actores y participación en los procesos de desarrollo, que evidencian el movimiento desde un enfoque eminentemente tecnológico hacia una propuesta más social e integradora
Las limitaciones en el manejo de la diversidad agrobiológica en Cuba, debido al déficit financiero, posibilitó una estrategia de fitomejoramiento alternativo y complementario al fitomejoramiento convencional y centralizado. Esta importante forma denominada Fitomejoramiento Participativo (FP), como parte integrante de la innovación agropecuaria local, se inició en el 2000 y después de ocho años de ejecución, los propios campesinos que se sumaron a estas ideas han evaluado su impacto.
El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar cómo se ha beneficiado el ecosistema agrícola del municipio con la introducción de diversidad. Se calcularon los índices de diversidad específica de Margalef y riqueza específica de Shannon-Weiner y se consideraron tres etapas: antes de FP, después de FP y puesta en acción del Programa de Innovación Agrícola Local (PIAL). Se realizó un levantamiento de especies y variedades en 17 fincas de productores del municipio La Palma, en las zonas donde ha intervenido el proyecto Fitomejoramiento Participativo (FP)
The Andhra Pradesh sorghum coalition illustrates the valued added by working in coalition. By combining different perspectives to give rise to new, synthesised ideas, the member organisations worked at a faster pace and achieved their objectives more successfully and sustainably than they could have done if working separately. The methodology of their research was designed collaboratively. As a result, scientists carried out repeat experiments on poultry, at the request of poultry farmers and feed manufacturers, which greatly increased their confidence in the evidence.
The emergence of a globalised knowledge economy, and the contemporary views of innovation capacity that this trend enables and informs, provides a new context in which development assistance to agricultural research and development needs to be considered. The main argument in this paper, which focuses on The Netherlands, is that development assistance should use this emerging scenario to identify niches where inputs can add value to the R&D investments of others, particularly in activities that help wire up innovation systems, linking R&D to other activities and actors in society.
In the systems perspective on innovation, co-operation between several different types of actors is seen as key to successful innovation. Due to the existence of several gaps that hinder such effective co-operation, the scientific and policy literature persistently points at the need for intermediary organizations to fulfill bridging and brokerage roles. This paper aims to provide an overview of the insights from the literature on such ‘innovation brokers’, and to contribute to the literature by distilling lines of enquiry and providing insights on one of the lines identified.
These notes summarise reflections on local innovation and participatory innovation development that took place within the PROLINNOVA International Support Team (IST), based on observations and discussions with network partners during advisory visits and international workshops.
This paper analyzes the impact of participation in multi-stakeholder platforms (Plataformas) aimed at linking smallholder potato farmers to the market in the mountain region of Ecuador. It describes and evaluates the Plataformas’ program to determine whether it has been successful in linking farmers to higher-value markets and the effects that such connections have brought, particularly with regard to farmers’ welfare and to the environment. The analysis is run comparing a set of different and carefully constructed control groups to beneficiaries and using various specifications.
The purposes of this course are to review the major reforms being considered internationally that aim to change the policy and institutional structure and operations of public sector agricultural extension systems, and to examine the advantages and disadvantages of each of these reforms as illustrated by the selected case studies. Aside from the introductory chapter, the course is organized into nine modules, which are conceived as part of a larger framework.