El presente artículo describe los resultados de diseminación participativa de semillas (DPS) en términos productivos, ambientales y socioeconómicos en Cuba y México. El concepto de diseminación participativa de semillas (DPS) surgió en Cuba a partir de la integración de las ferias de diversidad de semillas con la experimentación y diseminación de semillas por los campesinos. Una feria de diversidad de semillas es un método donde los fitomejoradores, productores y agentes extensionistas tienen acceso a la diversidad en uno o más cultivos.
El objetivo de la investigación fue analizar cómo se ha beneficiado el ecosistema agrícola del municipio con la introducción de diversidad. Se calcularon los índices de diversidad específica de Margalef y riqueza específica de Shannon-Weiner y se consideraron tres etapas: antes de FP, después de FP y puesta en acción del Programa de Innovación Agrícola Local (PIAL). Se realizó un levantamiento de especies y variedades en 17 fincas de productores del municipio La Palma, en las zonas donde ha intervenido el proyecto Fitomejoramiento Participativo (FP)
Este artículo presenta una propuesta de marco teórico, conceptual y operativo (MaTCo) diseñado para documentar las experiencias de dichos actores y las estrategias de innovación tecnológica implementadas en el Nodo de Innovación (HUB) Trópico Bajo de Chiapas. Dicho marco incluye indicadores para conocer los principios, metodologías y herramientas utilizadas por cada actor estudiado. Para ello fue necesario construir e implementar el MaTCo, desde una perspectiva socio-agronómica holística y aplicarlo a cuatro estudios de caso de actores que colaboran con el programa.
The European Innovation Partnership for agricultural productivity and sustainability (EIP-AGRI), which can be perceived as a platform based on interaction among farmers, researchers, and advisors/extensionists, represents a useful tool for a better understanding of applied innovation processes.
Multi-actors networks are increasingly used by farmers to link between them and to be interactively connected with other partners, such as advisory organizations, local governments, universities, and non-farm organizations. Given the importance assigned to the agricultural innovation by EU resorting to the networking between the research chain actors and the farmers, a strong focus on enhancing the creation of learning and innovation networks is expected.
Dairy farmers in the northern regions of New Zealand expressed widespread dissatisfaction with the performance and persistence of their pastures following drought conditions in 2007/08. Farmers were becoming disillusioned with the practice of renewing pasture as a means to introduce modern perennial ryegrass cultivars in their paddocks. This paper describes the formation and operation of an innovation network, consisting of private and public sector actors, that was formed in 2010 to improve the quality and consistency of advice provided to farmers.
The private sector’s presence in agricultural advisory services worldwide has been on the increase for over three decades. This trend has also been observed in the Mantaro Valley (Peru), in a context of dairy family farming. The objective of the communication is to analyse the modalities of advisory services privatization and assess the consequences of this privatization for the farmers and their livestock systems. Data were collected through input suppliers, different types of advisers and producers interviews.
This paper is an inquiry into the process of setting up a national, multi-stakeholder project collaboration aimed at stimulating the role of the private sector in the Australian agricultural extension and innovation systems.
This paper presents results from an action research intervention aimed at strengthening the role of private sector advisers in the Australian agricultural extension system. Private sector advisers participating in the research identified a number of barriers to their effective inclusion in this system.
While privatization of extension has received considerable attention with respect to implications for public and private good, less consideration has been given to structural and relational implications for knowledge sharing.