This document on Good Practices in Extension Research and Evaluation is developed as a hands on reference manual to help young researchers, research students, and field extension functionaries in choosing the right research methods for conducting quality research and evaluation in extension. This manual has been compiled by the resource persons who participated in the Workshop on ‘Good
Extension and advisory services (EAS) play a key role in facilitating innovation for sustainable agricultural development. To strengthen this role, appropriate investment and conducive policies are needed in EAS, guided by evidence. It is therefore essential to examine EAS characteristics and performance in the context of modern, pluralistic and increasingly digital EAS systems. In response to this need, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has developed guidelines and instruments for the systematic assessment of national EAS systems.
Extension and advisory services (EAS) play a key role in facilitating innovation processes, empowering marginalized groups through capacity development, and linking farmers with markets. EAS are increasingly provided by a range of actors and funded from diverse sources. With the broadened scope of EAS and the growing complexity of the system, the quantitative performance indicators used in the past (for example related to investment, staffing or productivity) are no longer adequate to assess the performance of EAS systems.
Extension and advisory services (EAS) play a key role in facilitating innovation processes, empowering marginalized groups through capacity development, and linking farmers with markets. Advisory services are increasingly provided by a range of actors and funded from diverse sources. With the broadened scope of EAS and the growing complexity of the system, the quantitative performance indicators used in the past (e.g. related to investment, staffing or productivity) are not adequate anymore to understand whether the system is well-functioning.
Este documento describe la memoria del taller etapa II del proyecto regional RED SICTA que busca contribuir con la implementación del proceso de formación y desarrollo de capacidades de la red nacional de innovación tecnológica en diseño de su estrategia de sostenibilidad y gestión de proyectos, en la movilización de recursos para las cadenas de maíz y frijol con enfoque territorial en Nicaragua.
Este documento describe como analizar y documentar la ejecución los procesos y de los resultados de la implementación de las actividades durante la tercera fase del proyecto Red SICTA. De manera que contribuya a dinamizar los procesos técnicos y administrativos, y con ello facilitar que se presten servicios de calidad a los productores participantes de las cadenas de maíz y frijol.
Este documento describe el El Programa Integrador de IICA a formosa que está estructurado con cinco componentes principales y un componente de apoyo: (i) Programa para el desarrollo de frutas tropicales y subtropicales (PROFRUTA-FORMOSA) y sus respectivos planes de acción; (ii) Proyecto de desarrollo productivo sostenible de la región oeste formoseño (iii) Programa para mejorar la competitividad de la cadena de valor de la ganadería bovina de carne ; (iv) Programa de desarrollo sustentable para los recursos naturales de los ecosistemas de Formosa; (v) Proyecto de desarrollo rural sostenibl
El objetivo general del proyecto es contribuir al fomento agroalimentario y competitividad del subsector frutícola de Panamá, generando beneficios socioeconómicos importantes para la población rural y urbana, en el marco de la implementación de estrategias nacionales de desarrollo sostenible de la agricultura, seguridad alimentaria y exportaciones.
El Plan Estratégico de la Cadena Florícola del Paraguay, busca proveer de una herramienta estratégica que guíe la priorización e implementación de las actividades a realizar durante el lapso de 5 años, en función de la visión compartida por los actores de la cadena florícola del Paraguay.
Local stakeholders and agricultural producers in Latin America have limited access to agroclimatic information and, when they do gain access to it, they have difficulty translating it into understandable and actionable knowledge. While climate services are recognized as contributing to bridging the gap between the generation of climate information and its use by stakeholders, their provision and use in Latin America still represents critical challenge.