Esa tesis doctoral tiene como objetivo general analizar el proceso de evaluaciónde impactos económicos, sociales y debido a la jeneración de intangibles de innovaciones generadas por centros públicos brasileños de investigación. Se justifica la elección de Brasil y de las innovaciones desarrolladas en el sector agrícola en razón de la importancia económica y social que tiene para el país el desarrollo de las actividades de este sector, que genera una de cada tres unidades monetarias del Producto Interno Bruto - PIB.
Esta tesis tuvo como propósito analizar y conocer el aporte que las fincas integrales realizan a la conservación de los servicios ecosistémicos y al mejoramiento de la calidad de vida de las familias que dependen de ellas, mediante el uso de criterios e indicadores que fueron construidos para el efecto y la aplicación del Enfoque de Medios de Vida Sostenibles (EMVS) y el Marco de los Capitales de la Comunidad (MCC), métodos que permitieron la comparación entre las fincas identificadas (integrales, en proceso de integración y no integrales).
El presente trabajo de graduación tiene como finalidad la evaluación participativa sobre el área social y sobre la promoción del proyecto Estufa Finca en familias Bribri de Talamanca, Costa Rica.
Primary Innovation is a five year collaborative initiative demonstrating and evaluating co-innovation, a systemic approach to innovation addressing complex problems, in five ‘innovation projects’ (active case studies) in different agricultural industries. In defining the elements of co-innovation, Primary Innovation has emphasised nine principles which guide activity in the innovation projects.
This report describes the concepts and methods used to evaluate a regional capacity development project in Latin America. The project under study aims to strengthen planning, monitoring, and evaluation in agricultural research organizations in the region. The report outlines the procedures employed in five evaluation studies and summarizes the results of each study. It then presents consolidated findings in response to three evaluation questions: What were the main contributions of the project to agricultural research management?
In this paper its argued that when flexibly applied and adapted to capture dynamics typical in systems innovation projects, the Log Frame Approach (LFA) ( and logical frameworks have considerable utility to support evaluation for both learning and accountability, and for identifying and addressing institutional logics, which leads to system innovation.
The quest for innovation lies at the heart of European rural development policy and is integral to the Europe 2020 strategy. While social innovation has become a cornerstone of increased competitiveness and the rural situation legitimizes public intervention to encourage innovation, the challenges of its effective evaluation are compounded by the higher ‘failure’ rate implied by many traditional performance measures.
Agricultural innovations are seen as a key avenue to improve nutrition and health in smallholder farm households. But details of these agriculture-nutrition-health linkages are not yet well understood. While there is a broad literature on the adoption of agricultural technologies, most studies primarily focus on impacts in terms of productivity and income. Nutrition and health impacts have rarely been analyzed. In this article, we argue that future impact studies should include nutrition and health dimensions more explicitly.
This Guide to Evaluating Rural Extension has been developed by the Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services (GFRAS). The purpose is to support those involved in extension evaluation to choose how to conduct more comprehensive, rigorous, credible and useful evaluations. The Guide supports readers to understand different types of evaluation, to make decisions on what is most appropriate for their circumstances, and to access further sources of theoretical and practical information.
This paper discusses a range of approaches and benchmarks that can guide future design of value chain impact evaluations. Twenty studies were reviewed to understand the status and direction of value chain impact evaluations. A majority of the studies focus on evaluating the impact of only a few interventions, at several levels within the value chains. Few impact evaluations are based on well-constructed, well-conceived comparison groups. Most of them rely on use of propensity score matching to construct counterfactual groups and estimate treatment effects.