This paper captures lessons from recent experiences on using ‘theories of change’ amongst organisations involved in the research–policy interface. The literature in this area highlights much of the complexity inherent in the policymaking process, as well as the challenges around finding meaningful ways to measure research uptake. As a tool, ‘theories of change’ offers much, but the paper argues that the very complexity and dynamism of the research-to-policy process means that any theory of change will be inadequate in this context.
This book documents a unique series of 19 case studies where agricultural biotechnologies were used to serve the needs of smallholders in developing countries. They cover different regions, production systems, species and underlying socio-economic conditions in the crop (seven case studies), livestock (seven) and aquaculture/fisheries (five) sectors. Most of the case studies involve a single crop, livestock or fish species and a single biotechnology.
The study report is based on case studies from Bangladesh (Sulaiman, 2010), Bolivia (Pafumi and Ulloa, 2010), DR Congo (Mbaye, 2010) and Ghana (Adjei-Nsiah and Dormon, 2010) which were carried out with the purpose of assessing needs and gaps with regard to the provision of innovation support services for climate change adaptation. It took the form of desk-studies complemented with key informant interviews.
To respond to threats of climate change, Benin has joined the international community in the development and implementation of climate policies.
Growing local and informal markets in Asia and Africa provide both challenges and opportunities for small holders. In developing countries, market failures often lead to suboptimal performance of the value chains and limited and inequitable participation of the poor. In recent years, innovation platforms have been promoted as mechanisms to stimulate and support multistakeholder collaboration in the context of research for development. They are recognized as having the potential to link value chain actors, and enhance communication and collaboration to overcome market failures.
El objeto del proyecto “Cohesión Territorial e Inversión Privada Agroindustrial” es la distribución espacial de las inversiones privadas en la agroindustria alimentaria en Chile, México y Perú. El interés es describir la distribución espacial, sus causas y sus efectos socioeconómicos. El objeto de estudio de este proyecto es la distribución espacial de las inversiones privadas en la agroindustria alimentaria en Chile, México y Perú (en adelante, inversiones intermedias). Es documento busca describir esta distribución espacial, sus causas y sus efectos socio-económicos.
Este documento analiza actividades valoradas por actores involucrados en PAIP e indaga sobre la relación con los niveles y tipos de inversiones del proyecto. Ordena y sintetiza los resultados de un taller y de consultas con una muestra de usuarios, actores locales y agentes del proyecto, que aportan a la reflexión más amplia de la iniciativa en curso sobre criterios y procesos de diseño de proyectos de desarrollo rural para mejorar sus impactos a partir de la interacción entre inversiones focalizadas en las personas y en los territorios
This publication, consisting of several modules, includes participatory research approaches for examining a wide range of questions regarding if and how farming practices are being modified to deal with a changing environment, and the constraints and opportunities these changes pose for both men and women.
Innovation learning platforms have their roots in the agricultural innovation systems (AIS) approach. AIS emphasizes a systems view of agricultural innovations and conceptualizes an innovation system as all individuals and organizations that keep on interacting in producing and using knowledge and the institutional context of knowledge sharing and learning. Research creates knowledge and technology; but innovation process goes further to include putting that knowledge into use.
The problem being addressed during this session of the Second Global Conference on Agricultural Research for Development (GCARD2), which was held in Punta del Este, Uruguay, in 2012, is how we can bring together the needed diversity – of stakeholders and approaches – and understand better a number of multidimensional and complex questions such as: How can we inform stakeholders on alternative future scenarios and debate the desirability, consequences, winners and losers of diverse scenarios? How to better combine quantitative analyses with qualitative arguments?