Este documento analiza actividades valoradas por actores involucrados en PAIP e indaga sobre la relación con los niveles y tipos de inversiones del proyecto. Ordena y sintetiza los resultados de un taller y de consultas con una muestra de usuarios, actores locales y agentes del proyecto, que aportan a la reflexión más amplia de la iniciativa en curso sobre criterios y procesos de diseño de proyectos de desarrollo rural para mejorar sus impactos a partir de la interacción entre inversiones focalizadas en las personas y en los territorios
Este documento haceun análisis sobre la productividad agregada del sector agropecuario en Ecuador, como para la producción de arroz, maíz duro, banano y cacao, tanto por hectárea como por persona empleada, diferenciando por niveles tecnológicos y tipos de productores. La finalidad última es disponer de un análisis actualizado sobre productividad de los principales rubros productivos del país y entre diferentes tipos de productores, con la finalidad de hacer recomendaciones concretas de política pública
Este documento analiza los temas emergentes y sus implicancias respecto a las políticas de desarrollo. La sección 2 aborda las tendencias en la expansión de los supermercados en los países en desarrollo, y la sección 3 analiza los factores determinantes del fenómeno. La sección 4 versa sobre las repercusiones en los consumidores y los minoristas tradicionales, que se encuentran en los eslabones posteriores del sistema agroalimentario, y en los procesadores, mayoristas y agricultores, que se ubican en los anteriores del mismo.
La presente consultoría examina cualitativamente un compendio de lecciones aprendidas por parte de las cooperativas rurales del Ecuador, en su misión de atender las necesidades financieras de los productores agropecuarios. Tiene por objetivo realizar un estudio de las iniciativas de financiamiento productivo agropecuario de cuatro cooperativas de ahorro y crédito rurales, para extraer aprendizajes y propuestas de trabajo complementario con el nuevo Banco de Desarrollo Rural
Social learning in multi-actor innovation networks is increasingly considered an important precondition for addressing sustainability in regional development contexts. Social learning is seen as a means for enabling stakeholders to take advantage of the diversity in perspectives, interests and values for generating more sustainable practices and policies. Although more and more research is done on the meaning and manifestations of social learning, particularly in the context of natural resource management, little is known about the social dynamics in the process of social learning.
This synthesis report presents the outputs of the workshop organised by CTA at its headquarters in Wageningen, The Netherlands, 15-17 July 2008. The outputs are presented in two main parts, each corresponding to one of the workshop objectives, and ends with a section on the way forward as suggested by the workshop participants. It also includes a first attempt to come to a consolidated generic framework on AIS performance indicators, based on the outputs of the different working groups.
The question of how agricultural research can best be used for developmental purposes is a topic of some debate in developmental circles. The idea that this is simply a question of better transfer of ideas from research to farmers has been largely discredited. Agricultural innovation is a process that takes a multitude of different forms, and, within this process, agricultural research and expertise are mobilised at different points in time for different purposes. This paper uses two key analytical principles in order to find how research is actually put into use.
Explicitly integrating reflection in the learning process of multi-stakeholder processes (MSPs) increases the likelihood that purposeful change will occur. When reflectivity is made part of learning in MSPs, learning will become clearer and better articulated and it will contribute more strongly to purposeful change in a complex context. MSP facilitators should deliberately include reflective learning sessions and tools in the process design and implementation.
The purpose of the paper, using a comprehensive innovation systems failure framework, is to assess the performance of agrifood innovation systems of Scotland and the Netherlands, through analysis of the key innovation actors (organisations, networks or influential individuals), and their key functions (research provider, intermediary etc), and those mechanisms that either facilitate or hinder the operation of the IS (known as inducing and blocking mechanisms, respectively).
The emergence of a globalised knowledge economy, and the contemporary views of innovation capacity that this trend enables and informs, provides a new context in which development assistance to agricultural research and development needs to be considered. The main argument in this paper, which focuses on The Netherlands, is that development assistance should use this emerging scenario to identify niches where inputs can add value to the R&D investments of others, particularly in activities that help wire up innovation systems, linking R&D to other activities and actors in society.