Effective monitoring of agriculture: a response



View results in:
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/88311
Type: 
journal article
Author(s): 
Sachs J. D.
Remans R.
Smukler S. M.
Winowiecki L.
Andelman S. J.
Cassman K. G.
Castle D.
DeFries R.
Denning G.
Fanzo J.
Jackson L. E.
Leemans R.
Lehmann J.
Milder J. C.
Naeem S.
Nziguheba G.
Palm C. A.
Pingali P. L.
Reganold J. P.
Richter D. D.
Scherr S. J.
Sircely J.
Sullivan C.
Tomich T. P.
Sanchez P. A.
Description: 

The development of effective agricultural monitoring networks is essential to track, anticipate and manage changes in the social, economic and environmental aspects of agriculture. The authors welcome the perspective of Lindenmayer and Likens (J. Environ. Monit., 2011, 13, 1559) as published in the Journal of Environmental Monitoring on their earlier paper, “Monitoring the World's Agriculture” (Sachs et al., Nature, 2010, 466, 558–560). In this response, they address three main critiques labeled as ‘the passive approach’, ‘the problem with uniform metrics’ and ‘the problem with composite metrics’. They expand on specific research questions at the core of the network design, on the distinction between key universal and site-specific metrics to detect change over time and across scales, and on the need for composite metrics in decision-making. They believe that simultaneously measuring indicators of the three pillars of sustainability (environmentally sound, social responsible and economically viable) in an effectively integrated monitoring system will ultimately allow scientists and land managers alike to find solutions to the most pressing problems facing global food security.

Publication year: 
2012