From Best Practice to Best Fit: A Framework for Designing and Analyzing Pluralistic Agricultural Advisory Services Worldwide



View results in:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13892240903309595
DOI: 
10.1080/13892240903309595
ISBN: 
1389224090
Provider: 
Licensing of resource: 
Not open / All rights reserved
Type: 
journal article
Journal: 
The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension: Competence for Rural Innovation and Transformation
Number: 
4
Pages: 
341-355
Volume: 
15
Year: 
2009
Author(s): 
Birner, R.
Davis, K.
Pender, J.
Nkonya, E.
Anandajayasekeram, P.
Ekboir, J.
Mbabu, A.
Spielman, D. J.
Horna, D.
Benin, S.
Cohen, M.
Description: 

The article provides a conceptual framework and discusses research methods for analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services. The framework can also assist policy-makers in identifying reform options. It addresses the following question: Which forms of providing and financing agricultural advisory services work best in which situation? The framework ‘disentangles’ agricultural advisory services by distinguishing between (1) governance structures, (2) capacity, (3) management, and (4) advisory methods. The framework suggests an impact chain approach to analyze the performance and impact of agricultural advisory services and discusses theoretical and empirical research methods that can be used when applying the framework. The framework shows that reforms of agricultural advisory services can combine different reform elements*such as decentralization, contracting out, using new advisory methods, and changing the management style*in different ways so as to best fit local circumstances. Using a New Institutional Economics approach (transaction costs approach), the article shows that the following sets of contextual factors need to be considered in this regard: the policy environment; the capacity of potential service providers; the type of production systems and market access of farm households; and the characteristics of local communities. The framework can be used to develop assessment tools for agricultural advisory services, to inform processes of reforming of agricultural advisory services and to guide inter-disciplinary research.

Publication year: 
2009